‘Mr. Jayasundere reiterated that the substantive relief sought has been granted by the SC judgment, and that the prayers are vague in terms of the decision being challenged.
The State submits that fresh material is needed to decide upon the criminality of the 2nd Respondent, and that it is prudent to await the decision of the disciplinary inquiry pending against the 2nd Respondent. Ms. Tegal submits that there is no need for fresh material and that there is ample evidence available at present to prosecute the 2nd Respondent.
However, court deemed it prudent to refix the matter for support until such time as the decision of the disciplinary inquiry is arrived at.’
Refixed for support on 14th October 2025.
